[firefly] [PATCH] Staging: wlan-ng: fix sparse warnings for static functions

Teodora Băluţă teobaluta at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 00:55:50 EEST 2013


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Silviu Popescu
<silviupopescu1990 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Teodora Baluta <teobaluta at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fix fixes sparse warnings for static functions
>> * drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:101:5: warning:
>> symbol 'prism2_change_virtual_intf' was not declared.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Teodora Baluta <teobaluta at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c |   29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
>> index f1bce18..995e6ed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int prism2_domibset_pstr32(wlandevice_t *wlandev,
>>
>>
>>  /* The interface functions, called by the cfg80211 layer */
>> -int prism2_change_virtual_intf(struct wiphy *wiphy,
>> +static int prism2_change_virtual_intf(struct wiphy *wiphy,
>>                                struct net_device *dev,
>>                                enum nl80211_iftype type, u32 *flags,
>>                                struct vif_params *params)
>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ exit:
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                    u8 key_index, bool pairwise, const u8 *mac_addr,
>>                    struct key_params *params)
>>  {
>> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ exit:
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                    u8 key_index, bool pairwise, const u8 *mac_addr, void *cookie,
>>                    void (*callback)(void *cookie, struct key_params*))
>>  {
>> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ int prism2_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_del_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_del_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                    u8 key_index, bool pairwise, const u8 *mac_addr)
>>  {
>>         wlandevice_t *wlandev = dev->ml_priv;
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ exit:
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_set_default_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_set_default_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                            u8 key_index, bool unicast, bool multicast)
>>  {
>>         wlandevice_t *wlandev = dev->ml_priv;
>> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ int prism2_set_default_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>  }
>>
>>
>> -int prism2_get_station(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_get_station(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                        u8 *mac, struct station_info *sinfo)
>>  {
>>         wlandevice_t *wlandev = dev->ml_priv;
>> @@ -327,7 +327,8 @@ int prism2_get_station(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>         return result;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_scan(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct cfg80211_scan_request *request)
>> +static int prism2_scan(struct wiphy *wiphy,
>> +       struct cfg80211_scan_request *request)
>>  {
>>         struct net_device *dev;
>>         struct prism2_wiphy_private *priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
>> @@ -436,7 +437,7 @@ exit:
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
>> +static int prism2_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
>>  {
>>         struct prism2_wiphy_private *priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
>>         wlandevice_t *wlandev = priv->wlandev;
>> @@ -478,7 +479,7 @@ exit:
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                    struct cfg80211_connect_params *sme)
>>  {
>>         wlandevice_t *wlandev = dev->ml_priv;
>> @@ -602,7 +603,7 @@ exit:
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_disconnect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_disconnect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                       u16 reason_code)
>>  {
>>         wlandevice_t *wlandev = dev->ml_priv;
>> @@ -626,19 +627,19 @@ int prism2_disconnect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>  }
>>
>>
>> -int prism2_join_ibss(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>> +static int prism2_join_ibss(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
>>                      struct cfg80211_ibss_params *params)
>>  {
>>         return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_leave_ibss(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev)
>> +static int prism2_leave_ibss(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev)
>>  {
>>         return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>  }
>>
>>
>> -int prism2_set_tx_power(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev,
>> +static int prism2_set_tx_power(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev,
>>                         enum nl80211_tx_power_setting type, int mbm)
>>  {
>>         struct prism2_wiphy_private *priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
>> @@ -665,7 +666,7 @@ exit:
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -int prism2_get_tx_power(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev,
>> +static int prism2_get_tx_power(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev,
>>                         int *dbm)
>>  {
>>         struct prism2_wiphy_private *priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>
> As Vlad previously suggested [1], you should align the second and
> following lines of the function header with the first with regards to
> the opening parenthesis. If that seems to make the code lean too much
> to the right, you could also try and split the first line after the
> return type and align the third and subsequent lines to the second.
> Play with these options and see which looks best in each case. Other
> than that, no nit picks. :)
>
> [1] http://lists.rosedu.org/pipermail/firefly/2013-October/000105.html

Thank you! :)

Teo


More information about the firefly mailing list