[rosedu-general] Iesire ROSEdu - 1 mai 2011

[Mihai Maruseac]

2011/4/23 Andrei Picus <office.nightcrawler at gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Mihai Maruseac <mihai.maruseac at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Andrei Picus
>> <office.nightcrawler at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Mihai Maruseac
>> > <mihai.maruseac at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrei Picus
>> >> <office.nightcrawler at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Mihai Maruseac
>> >> > <mihai.maruseac at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Andrei Picus
>> >> >> <office.nightcrawler at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Laura Vasilescu
>> >> >> > <vasilescu.laura at gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2011/4/23 Andrei Picus <office.nightcrawler at gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >> > But it's way better
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > 1 mai (by including this I made it relevant to the topic)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Mulțumim, Andrei >:D<
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Tocmai doream să ne luăm de voi (conform ultimei reguli din
>> >> >> >> Constituție
>> >> >> >> [0] )
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Deci, cine mai vine de 1 mai la grătar? :)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> [0] -
>> >> >> >> http://lists.rosedu.org/pipermail/offtopic/2011-April/000243.html
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regulile alea sunt doar pentru fetele din ROSEdu, and no! long
>> >> >> > (blonde)
>> >> >> > hair
>> >> >> > =/= girl
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And now on topic, I'll probably pass in favor of bbq at home
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A se observa ce operator de inegalitate a folosit:D
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> http://lists.rosedu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rosedu-general
>> >> >
>> >> > You caught me :D =/= looks funkier than !=
>> >>
>> >> Era o remarcă pozitivă. I like =/= better than !=.
>> >>
>> >> De fapt, cât timp nu folosești (not (eqv? a b)) e ok :D
>> >
>> > De ce as face asta, as folosi (and (not (< a b)) (not (> a b)))
>> >
>>
>> Păi vezi că (not (a < b)) && (not (a > b)) (scris și all . map not [a
>> < b, a > b]) funcționează doar dacă a și b sunt instanțe ale Ord

Și cum ai și class Eq a => Ord a where ... rezultă că poți să spui
despre mai multe chestii că sunt egale între ele decât poți să spui că
sunt mai importante sau mai orice altceva.